<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/">
<title>Protein Spotlight</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/</link>
<description>one month, one protein</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-20T16:08:33+01:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=7.9.5" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/288/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/287/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/286/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/285/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/284/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/283/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/282/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/281/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/280/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/279/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/278/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/277/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/276/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/275/" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/274/" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/288/">
<title>on the notion of tall</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/288/</link>
<description>Take a child. Show it two toy animals that differ in height and ask which is the mum and which is the dad. The youngster will probably point to the tallest and say: &quot;That&apos;s the dad&quot;. Because that is what we see in real life. It is also the way humans, like animals, are usually depicted in children&apos;s books and films. Remember &quot;Goldilocks and the three bears&quot;? The bigness of Dad, the &apos;mediumness&apos; of Mum and the littleness of Baby bear? It&apos;s not only fiction, though. On an average, men are indeed taller than women. Why? Undoubtedly, natural selection will have played a role. Tall men are imposing, and hence instinctively sensed as dominant figures that can offer protection. Over the course of time, female humans will have been attracted to them for status as well as to ensure their progeny&apos;s safety and, who knows, inheritance of the trait. But this doesn&apos;t explain the underlying biology that makes a man taller than a woman. Recently, an intriguing explanation emerged. We know that the SHOX protein is involved in bone growth and elongation. What was discovered is that the protein is less expressed in women than it is in men because of the chromosomal location of its gene.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-20T16:08:33+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/287/">
<title>give and take </title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/287/</link>
<description>Survival is the essence of life. This may sound like an abysmal platitude but, in the living world, the act of survival implies an awful lot. To survive, many animals eat other animals, which they must first kill. Birds swallow seeds thus depriving them of a chance to grow into plants. Fungi destroy crops as they use them for their own reproduction. So life, or survival, is also strongly associated with death. A lot is going on at the molecular level too, where myriads of pathways are set into action as a response to nutrition, to infection or to a predator&apos;s attack. Plants are intriguing in that their survival cannot depend on mobility: they are unable to flee predators or infection, and quite unfitted to run after prey. Their survival depends on how their stems and leaves develop and move to catch sunlight, for instance, as well as on their means to fight off pathogens. For this, they may even benefit from the help of another species. One example has been described between poplar trees and fungi, in particular the fungus Trichoderma asperellum. T.asperellum, like all fungi, expresses small proteins known as hydrophobins which have a role in fungal growth and defence. One of these hydrophobins, HFB2-6, can prompt poplar signalling pathways that are crucial for the tree&apos;s own growth and defence.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-24T11:17:55+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/286/">
<title>a tribute</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/286/</link>
<description>As I crossed Geneva this morning and approached the office, I felt a growing sadness. I realised that, if I was walking in this direction in the first place, it was thanks to Amos Bairoch. Flashback to 1993: I have just emerged from a long and bumpy journey across the realm of academia, with a degree in biology and in dire need of a job. Over a glass of wine, my mother mentions my case to a distant aunt who gives it a thought as she serves herself to an olive. A nephew of hers might be able to help, she answers. Indeed, the nephew did. Nicolas Mermod, now a respected biologist himself, got in touch with me and said that he knew a friend who was looking for people to assist him with a database. In those days, for me at least, the word &apos;database&apos; was still a hazy concept, and I wasn&apos;t sure it was my cup of tea. I was in no position to be picky, however, so I thanked my distant cousin and gave Amos a call. The following day, I found myself walking up a narrow path leading to a small house in Nyon, a town on the edge of the Lac Léman. I rang the doorbell. Though I was unaware of it at the time, it turned out to be one of these encounters that sets you on a track you least expect but, with hindsight, marks a milestone in your life.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T14:53:21+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/285/">
<title>thirst </title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/285/</link>
<description>Water is one of the major molecules of life. Which is why the greater part of us is made of it. As a child, I found this hard to fathom. Should we not then be relatively liquid? I don&apos;t think I ever found a satisfying answer, nor did I really seek one, until I gained knowledge on the underlying physiology of organisms. Water is harboured within cells or flows in the fluids outside our cells, while our organs and tissues are held together in a semi-rigid mass thanks to our skeleton. Water is always moving around inside us too, and continuously leaves our body as we transpire, breathe or excrete - so it needs to be replaced. This is why we drink, and why we it is so important to feel the sensation of thirst. Quenching our thirst is not just deeply satisfying to our senses, it keeps us alive. But where does the sensation arise from? There&apos;s a thought. Is it just the result of a dry palate? No. The appetite for water is shaped by something far more intricate. We have a thirst centre in our brain where protein sensors measure the levels of molecules such as salt or glucose in our blood. When our organs are hungry for water, it shows in our blood and chemical messages are sent to our brain to nurture the feeling of thirst. In animals, this sensor is known as TMEM63B.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-18T09:39:54+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/284/">
<title>why dung?</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/284/</link>
<description>Who hasn&apos;t gone out for some fresh air and been incommoded by the pungent smell of manure? Why have farmers been flinging dung on their ploughed fields for thousands of years? The answer is nitrogen. Though our ancestors were unaware of the chemistry involved in their actions, they did realise that what livestock excreted - urine and faeces - was good for their crops. This is because animal urine is full of urea, which is full of nitrogen. When livestock faeces and urine is mixed, the faecal enzyme urease breaks down the urea to release carbon dioxide and the nitric compound ammonia, which is volatile. That&apos;s the stench. Ammonia is fixed by plants, which then use it to form compounds as fundamental as DNA, RNA, ATP and amino acids. In animals, or humans for that matter, ammonia is actually a waste product and can be toxic at high levels. Our liver deals with this toxicity by transforming ammonia into urea. But it is not the only way to deal with this compound. Scientists discovered that the enzyme glutamine synthetase can also render ammonia harmless by transforming it into glutamine.  </description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T09:42:21+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/283/">
<title>elusive</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/283/</link>
<description>My grandmother had a lovely pantry. It was a small room next to the kitchen, dedicated to the accumulation of &apos;non-perishables&apos;, i.e. mainly jam, rice, flour, sugar, dried potato, packets of biscuits and noodles. In some dark corner, you would invariably find a tin or two of powdered eggs or milk - a reminder of the days when fresh eggs and milk were hard to come by. My grandmother never really lost the habit of hoarding food, of storing the basics to provide sustenance to the family if needed. Cells, too, have their pantries. Germ cells, in particular. Plant germ cells have vacuoles. Birds&apos; eggs have yolk. And mammalian oocytes have cytoplasmic lattices. All of which are used to bank nutrients for the embryonic development. Oocyte cytoplasmic lattices were discovered in the 1960s but we are only beginning to understand their molecular structure - and hence how they work. It seems, now, that cytoplasmic lattices are a place where maternal proteins accumulate to provide nutrients for developing embryos. Once thought to be composed of strings of ribosomes or keratin, we now know that cytoplasmic lattices consist of several components, one of which is a puzzling protein known as peptidyl arginine deiminase 6 or PADI6.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-19T16:35:35+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/282/">
<title>ramifications</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/282/</link>
<description>There is much talk about plastic these days. And with reason. Besides depending on fossil fuels, plastic is infesting every nook and cranny of our planet because there is simply too much of it. Since the invention of bakelite in 1907, human dependency on the astonishingly varied properties of plastics has, understandably, never ceased to grow. Up popped the polyester polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, in the 1940s and an inventor&apos;s idea to use it to bottle soft drinks in the 1970s - which marked the beginning of a catastrophe. Today, we are desperate to find ways of recycling plastics and degrading them in eco-friendly ways. We have already discovered bacteria that are happy to eat PET for dinner - although not fast or efficiently enough for our liking. Lately, scientists came across a similar process that occurs in Nature when certain fungi, such as Aspergillus oryzae, invade plants. Plant cells in contact with the air are protected not only by a film of wax but also by cutin polyesters which are similar in structure to PET. Fungi have to degrade the cutin polyesters in order to reach the plants&apos; flesh. They do this with the help of an intriguing little protein known as hydrophobin which, it turns out, can also be used to stimulate the degradation of PET.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-26T14:42:30+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/281/">
<title>foam etc.</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/281/</link>
<description>The nice thing about shampoo is the foam it produces. Because the soapy froth is a pleasant part of the procedure. But how many of us actually wonder why shampoo foams at all? Foaming agents is the answer. If you&apos;re using an eco-friendly shampoo, there&apos;s a chance that one of these agents is saponin, an organic chemical found in plants - notably in a plant commonly known as soapwort, soapweed, crow soap or even wild sweet William. Though native to Europe, soapwort grows naturally in many parts of the world, usually in open undisturbed places which many of us would qualify as &apos;overgrown&apos;: on the sides of riverbanks, on roadsides, in fields, in pastures, in rundown gardens and on abandoned home sites. It&apos;s the kind of plant we tend to ignore, although scientists are developing a keen interest in it. This is because, besides producing foam, saponins have several biological activities that could be of therapeutic interest. For this reason, a lot of effort has been put into understanding how plants synthesize saponins. It turns out that they are the end product of a metabolic pathway which involves fourteen steps and as many enzymes.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-06-23T14:17:37+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/280/">
<title>a chromosome&apos;s glue</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/280/</link>
<description>We all begin with one cell, which divides into two - and so on. It sounds straightforward but a cell has various components (nucleus, mitochondria, Golgi apparatus...) each of which carries out vital activities. If two daughter cells are to survive, they must receive a copy of each component from the mother cell. A mother cell cannot just split in two, pour half of its contents into one cell and tilt the rest in the second. That would be like producing two cars of the same make where one is built with no engine and the other with no wheels. Every part of a cell has a specific and an essential role, which is why each part has to be inherited by progeny. Among these essential components daughter cells must receive a copy of their mother&apos;s DNA. The only way to do this is for the mother cell to double its DNA and then distribute it in such a way that the DNA in each daughter cell is identical in quantity and nature. This can occur thanks to a mechanism known as mitosis. During mitosis, a dividing cell&apos;s chromosomes (its DNA) alternate between two opposing states: individualized and clustered. It turns out that a protein - already known to scientists - is directly involved in the making of these two chromosomal states. Its name? Ki-67.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-20T16:46:24+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/279/">
<title>a dark kinase</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/279/</link>
<description>Spermatozoa. There are no other cells in humans - or indeed in any other animals - that have the capacity to wriggle and move forward the way spermatozoa do. Blood cells may dash around our bodies but they can only do so because they are swept up in the pulse and flow of blood. Spermatozoa make progress like little animals - which is why they were called &apos;animalcules&apos; by the Dutch microbiologist van Leeuwenhoek who was the first to observe them under a microscope in the 17th century. Many organisms can move like spermatozoa, such as bacteria or protists for example, but these are unicellular from the start and really only have themselves to depend upon. Spermatozoa cannot survive on their own, as they don&apos;t have the genetic makeup for that, but they can move on their own. In fact, locomotion is really all they have evolved for. Their sole aim is to reach an ovum into which they will inject their DNA. So evolution has trimmed the architecture of spermatozoa down to the very essential: a head (in which resides the nucleus) attached to a powerful tail. The tail itself is a model of biological design and technology brought about by many proteins, among which a crucial kinase known as STK33.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-04-24T11:33:56+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/278/">
<title>relay</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/278/</link>
<description>Life is a powerful force. From the moment it appeared on Earth - which is estimated at roughly 4.5 billion years ago - it has never ceased to find ways of continuing, plucking from Nature what it needs to create offspring. Rich soil broken down by earthworms feeds the emerging buds of flowers. Grains shed by fruit provide hatchlings with food, and the planet&apos;s oceans stock up with plankton to sustain their schools of fish and pods of whales. This team spirit, if you like, is also found on the molecular scale. When mothers lactate, for example, their bodies draw calcium from their own bones to build the bones of their newborn. In the same vein, scientists discovered another relay at work further upstream where maternal factors are activated to replace the calcium that has been removed from the mother&apos;s bones. In this way, the mother&apos;s bones are not weakened while the baby&apos;s bones are strengthened - and life carries on. A maternal brain hormone that is directly involved in rebuilding maternal bone during lactation has recently been discovered. Its name: CCN3. CCN3 is not new to biologists, but its role in fortifying the bones of lactating mothers is.  </description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-03-25T10:51:17+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/277/">
<title>the dormant ribosome</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/277/</link>
<description>Snowdrops are here. The tips of daffodil shoots are pushing through the soil, and soft grey buds are preparing to burst on the magnolias. These are reminders that Winter marks the end of one life cycle while Spring marks the one about to begin. How does a cycle begin, for that matter? In fact, does a cycle ever stop? No, life cycles never truly stop but they can be delayed for certain periods of time. Depending on the organism and the surrounding conditions, quiescence can last for days, weeks, months, years - or even thousands of years. Consider certain bacteria, plant seeds, or even animals that hibernate. In fact, apparently, at least 60% of the planet&apos;s microbial biomass spends more time immersed in idleness than in action. In a way, this is not surprising given that any biological activity consumes energy - and some far more than others. Take human egg cells. Stalled for years in ovaries, they patiently await the meagre hope of maturing and the even sparser chance of being fertilized. What causes them to stall? Hosts of protein factors which impede, but also protect, crucial enzymes - such as ribosomes for instance. </description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-02-28T13:25:22+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/276/">
<title>yellow</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/276/</link>
<description>Chimpanzees use twigs to catch ants. Crows use roads to crack nuts. Humans too have always been good at diverting things for their own benefit - far more than any other species for that matter. We use water to make electricity, cows to provide us with milk and atoms to create heat. With the arrival of biotechnology, the habit has continued. A variety of molecules are now more known for what we do with them than for their original purpose. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) comes to mind - a protein that creates light in jellyfish and, for years now, has been used in research and medicine to label and track molecules and cells. Another is glucose oxidase, or GOx. This enzyme feeds on glucose and oxygen producing hydrogen peroxide in its wake. Since the 1950s, the enzymatic link between these three molecules has provided scientists with a limitless source of inspiration. GOx is currently used to preserve all sorts of consumable items while monitoring their sweetness and warding off microbes. It is also used in medicine to regulate glucose levels in fluids as it is used in the textile industry for bleaching and even in engineering to improve the viscosity of cements. A sort of success story for an enzyme that was discovered exactly 100 years ago.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-01-23T12:45:01+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/275/">
<title>unconventional</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/275/</link>
<description>There are about 8 billion people living on our planet today. It&apos;s a lot. But consider the following: one human body harbours about 380 trillion viruses and 39 trillion bacteria - both on our skin and underneath it. That means there are thousands of times more organisms living off one of us than there are humans living off the whole Earth. So, as you stroll down a snow-clad path on a crisp and sunny winter&apos;s afternoon, thinking how wonderful it sometimes is to be alone, from a purely biological point of view you are not. Your body is literally teeming with organisms that use you as convenient terrain to reproduce, multiply and spread. The great majority of these organisms - viruses, bacteria and fungi - belong to what is called our microbiome. Over the years, we have formed some kind of understanding with our microbiome, and we all get on together fairly well on a give and take basis. As an illustration, the sum of viruses we carry, our virome, is thought to have an overall role in keeping our immune system alert. In this light, scientists recently discovered a novel immune strategy used by our brain cells to prevent the herpes virus from infecting them. The mechanism involves a protein known as TMEFF1.</description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2024-12-20T17:25:15+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/274/">
<title>on dosing and compensating</title>
<link>http://www.proteinspotlight.org/spotlight/back_issues/274/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<em>Drosophila</em> flies are born with four pairs of chromosomes in each of their cells. It is the genetic heritage they receive from their genitors. Three of these pairs are simply two versions of the same chromosome, as in two copies of chromosomes 2, 3 and 4. The first pair, however, represents the sex chromosomes - of which there are two, X and Y. Female fruit flies receive an X chromosome from both parents, while male fruit flies receive an X chromosome from their female genitor and a Y chromosome from their male genitor. Just like in humans! In fact, just like all mammals. This is the system Nature uses to produce scores of male and female animals. Now give this a thought: if some fruit flies are XX and others are XY, do the former not have more of something? And the latter something else altogether? For the XY individuals, the answer is yes. That is what makes them male. For the XX individuals, however, the answer is no. Though they may carry an extra X chromosome, in <em>Drosophila</em>, researchers have discovered a protein whose role is to prevent any kind of genetic imbalance with regards, precisely, to X-linked genes. Its name? MSL2.]]></description>
<dc:subject>Article</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>vgerrits</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2024-11-28T14:37:45+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>